There was no significant difference between new and used IPs. Digora Optime Digital Imaging Plate 1 31mm x 41mm 6/Pack Thin and reusable A marker is visible on the image if the Imaging Plate is exposed from the back. There were no significant differences for up to 1000 exposures, and no significant difference was observed among images scanned with a delay of up to 3 h in new and used IPs. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and use of Dunnett’s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05). Immediately scanned pixel data were used as baseline for comparison. Image gray value (IGV) in each image was calculated for statistical analysis. Imaging plates of this new version are thinner and more flexible than previous ones. These images were exported as 24-bit tiff files with 8-bit gray value data, and mean gray values (MGVs) were measured and compared. In 2004, a new version of a storage phosphor plate (SPP)-based digital system, the Digora Optime (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland), became available for dentistry. Images without automatic gain control were used in both analyses. With proper handling, the imaging plates will serve you time after time, making the use of the system cost-eff ective. On the other hand, the recently developed intraoral digital system like Sigma CCD, Digora Optime PSP. The exposed IPs were then scanned 0, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min, and 3, 24, 72, and 144 h after exposure. DIGORA® Optime imaging plates have high wear resistance. the imaging methods can recognize 300 m voids4. Intraoral imaging plate system for dental radiography. The first exposure image data were used as baseline for comparison. Thin, flexible, re-usable imaging plates are easy to handle, resistant to wear and inexpensive to replace. Three new and three used IPs were tested for signal fading, and the other two new IPs were exposed 1000 times and then tested for durability. The materials examined consisted of eight IPs. To assess the durability of the imaging plates (IP) supplied with the Digora Optime ® digital imaging system in terms of their functionality after as many as 1000 exposures and the degree of signal fading that occurred after a delay of up to 144 h between exposure and scanning Methods